مطالعات جمعیتی

مطالعات جمعیتی

سیر تاریخی و تکاملی نظریه گذار جمعیتی: مطالعه‌ای برمبنای طیف‌سنجی سال انتشار مآخذ

نوع مقاله : پژوهشی

نویسندگان
1 مربی پژوهشی،گروه جامعه‌شناسی فرهنگی، پژوهشکده فرهنگ، هنر و معماری جهاد دانشگاهی، تهران، ایران (نویسنده مسئول).
2 دانشیاررشته علم اطلاعات و دانش‌شناسی،گروه علم اطلاعات و دانش‌شناسی، دانشگاه پیام نور، تهران، ایران.
3 دانش‌‌آموخته دوره دکتری جمعیت‌‌شناسی، گروه جمعیت‌‌شناسی، دانشکده علوم اجتماعی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران.
4 دانشیارجمعیت‌شناسی، گروه جمعیت‌شناسی، دانشکده علوم اجتماعی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران.
چکیده
یکی از نظریه‌های بنیادی در جمعیت‌شناسی، نظریه‌ گذار جمعیتی است که تغییرات جمعیتی را توصیف و تبیین می‌کند. در این مقاله با بهره‌‌‌گیری از روش طیف‌سنجی سال انتشار مآخذ (RPYS)، سیر تکاملی و تاریخی پژوهش‌های حوزه نظریه گذار جمعیتی بررسی شده است و همچنین آثار و چهره‌های تأثیرگذار در روند تکامل این نظریه مطالعه شده‌اند. داده‌های اولیه پژوهش، به روش علم‌سنجی از پایگاه استنادی وب آو ساینس(Web Of Science) استخراج شده است که 3359 مقاله را دربردارد. پس از استخراج کلیه‌ منابع به ‌کاررفته در این مقالات، داده‌ها با استفاده از نرم‌افزار مختص RPYS با عنوان  CRExplorer تجزیه و تحلیل شدند. یافته‌ها نشان داد که پر ارجاع‌ترین آثار در بازه زمانی 1750 تا 2000، به‌ترتیب، کتاب «رساله جمعیت» مالتوس (1798)، مقاله «جمعیت» نوتشتاین (1945) و مقاله «گذار جمعیتی دوم اروپا» ون دکا (1987) بوده است؛ اما در مجموع، حوزه‌ نظریه گذار جمعیتی، چهارده جهش تاریخی در سال‌های مختلف دارد. سال‌های 1986، 1987 و 2000 اوج جهش نظریه گذار جمعیتی بوده است؛ ازاین‌رو، داده‌های استنادی اطلاعات شایان ‌توجهی درباره بافت تاریخی علم و اهمیت پژوهش‌های پیشین و تأثیر آن‌ها بر پژوهش‌های بعدی ارائه می‌دهند.
کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله English

The Historical and Evolutionary Trajectory of Demographic Transition Theory: A Study Based on Referenced Publication Years Spectroscopy (RPYS)

نویسندگان English

Ali Hatami 1
Ali Akbar Khasseh 2
Noureddin Farash 3
Rasoul Sadeghi 4
1 Faculty member of the Institute of Culture, Art and Architecture, ACECR, Department of Cultural Sociology, Tehran, Iran.
2 Associate professor of Knowledge and Information Science, Department of Knowledge and Information Science, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran.
3 PhD Graduate in Demography, Department of Demography, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
4 Associate Professor of Demography, Department of Demography, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Tehran, Iran.
چکیده English

Demographic transition theory, as one of the most fundamental theories in demography, describes and explains demographic changes. This article examines the evolution of the demographic transition theory and influential works and figures contributing to this evolution using the Referenced Publication Year Spectroscopy (RPYS) method. The data were collected using scientometric methods from 3359 Web of Science citation database articles and analyzed using CRExplorer software. The findings showed that the most cited works from 1750 to 2000 were, respectively, An Essay on the Principle of Population by Malthus (1798), Population: The Problem of Growth by Notestein (1945), and Europe’s Second Demographic Transition by Van de Kaa (1987). The field of demographic transition theory experienced 14 historical leaps during different years, with peaks in 1986, 1987, and 2000. Thus, citation data provide insights into the historical context of science, and impact of prior research on subsequent studies.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Population
Demography
Demographic Transition
Citation Analysis
Scientometrics

Extendedabstract

Introduction

The task of demography is to describe and understand certain aspects of human society. Demography specifically focuses on the size, composition, and distribution of population, as well as how these characteristics change over time. Population theories have developed in response to demographic changes and have laid the foundation for further research. The demographic transition theory is a unique framework in population studies that helps explain demographic trends and processes across different societies.This theory has both a descriptive/historical aspect, which illustrates the stages of demographic transition, and an analytical aspect that aims to explain the decrease in mortality and fertility rates.

Progress in science relies on building upon previous knowledge, and understanding the historical context of scientific works can provide valuable insights into the evolution of theories. Therefore, this study aims to identify the most influential historical works in the field of demographic transition based on their publication dates, in order to gain a better understanding of the theory's development over time.

Data and Method

This study utilizes the RPYS scientometric method to trace the historical roots and influential works in the field of Demographic Transition (DT). Records were gathered by searching the Web of Science database for articles related to Demographic Transition. The RPYS method was then applied to analyze the references from 3,359 articles using CRExplorer software. The findings were presented across different time periods (1750-1900, 1901-1950, and 1951-2000). While RPYS studies typically focus on works from 1900 onwards, this study found significant references to pre-1900 works in the field of demographic transition, leading to an extension of the reference list timeframe to include works from 1750 onwards.

Findings

The study found that the most referenced works from 1750 to 2000 were Malthus's An Essay on the Principle of Population (1798), Notestein's article Population (1945), and van de Kaa's article The Second Demographic Transition (1987). The field of demographic transition theory experienced 14 significant shifts over different years, with peaks in 1986, 1987, and 2000. A notable observation in the historical evolution of the theory is the dominance of books before the twentieth century, particularly in economics and population studies, such as the works of Malthus and Dumont. However, the trend shifted in the first half of the twentieth century towards articles, especially after the introduction of trend data analysis in European countries. The shifts in 1929 and 1945 marked the transition to article-centered publications, with key papers by Thompson, Notestein, and Davis shaping the theory. As research on the demographic transition theory continued and data collection expanded globally, other scholars contributed new perspectives, influenced by economic and social changes associated with modernity and modernization. In the latter half of the twentieth century, scholars like Becker, Hajnal, Coale, Caldwell, Lesthaeghe, and van de Kaa further developed the theory, with influential books by Becker and Coale complemented by significant articles in demographic literature. The theory's growth was driven by interdisciplinary collaboration, involving economists, demographers, sociologists, mathematicians, and statisticians, with demography serving as the central discipline.

Discussion and Conclusion

Recent research in Europe has revitalized the demographic transition theory, now referred to as the "Second Demographic Transition," in light of ongoing changes on the continent. The theory is anticipated to undergo modifications, adjustments, and extensions to account for the intricacies of demographic shifts in the modern globalized era. Given the growing importance of gathering, disseminating, and interpreting trend data in the twenty-first century, it is probable that additional facets and evolutions of the theory will come to light.

صادقی، رسول (1401). جمعیت، توسعه و تغییرات اجتماعی، فصلنامه مطالعات میان‌رشته‌ای در علوم انسانی، 4(14)، 6-5. . doi: 10.22035/isih.2022.410
عباسی شوازی، محمد جلال و حسینی،حاتم (1387). قومیت و باروری: آزمون فرضیه‌های رقیب برای تبیین تفاوت‌های باروری در شهرستان ارومیه، نامه انجمن جمعیت‌شناسی ایران، 4(2)، 41-5.https://populationstudies.blogfa.com/post/26
ویکس، جان (1395). جمعیت، مفاهیم و موضوعات، ترجمه الهه میرزایی، تهران: موسسه مطالعات و مدیریت جامع و تخصصی جمعیتی کشور، ایران.
Becker, G. S. (1960). An economic analysis of fertility. In Demographic and economic change in developed countries (pp. 209-240). Columbia University Press. https://www.nber.org/books-and-chapters/demographic-and-economic-change-developed-countries/economic-analysis-fertility
Becker, G.S. (1981). A Treatise on the Family. Harvard university press. https://www.hup.harvard.edu/books/9780674906990
Bongaarts, J. (2009). Human population growth and the demographic transition. Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 364(1532), 2985–2990. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2009.0137
Bornmann, L & Marx, W. (2013). The proposal of a broadening of perspective in evaluative bibliometrics by complementing the times cited with a cited reference analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 7(1), 84-88. DOI: 10.1016/j.joi.2012.09.003
Brzozowska, Z. (2021). Attitudinal and behavioural indices of the second demographic transition: Evidence from the last three decades in Europe, demographic-research. 44-46,1115–1132. DOI: 10.4054/DemRes.2021.44.46
Caldwell, J.C., Bruce, K., Caldwell, P., Caldwell, P., McDonald, F., & Schindlmayr, T.H.. (2006). Demographic Transition Theory. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer. http://ndl.ethernet.edu.et/bitstream/123456789/49333/1/3.pdf
 Caldwell, J.C. (1976). Toward a restatement of demographic transition theory. Population and Development Review, 3(2), 321-366. https://doi.org/10.2307/1971615
Caldwell, J.C. (2006). Demographic Theory: A Long View. In: Demographic Transition Theory. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-4498-4_13
Chaplin, J.E., & Bashford, A. (2016). The New Worlds of Thomas Robert Malthus: Rereading the Principle of Population. Princeton: Princeton University Press. https://muse.jhu.edu/book/51991.
Coale, A. J. (1973). The demographic transition reconsidered, in International Union for the Scientific Study of Population (IUSSP) (ed): Proceedings of the international population conference 1973, Editions Ordina, Liège, 1: 53-73.
Coale, A.J., & Watkins, S. C. (1986). The decline of fertility in Europe: the revised proceedings of a Conference on the Princeton European Fertility Project. https://u.demog.berkeley.edu/~jrw/Biblio/Eprints/126grad/Coale/Extras/coale.1986_Decline.of.Fertility_chap1.pdf
Cronin, B., & Shaw, D. (2002). Identity-creators and image-makers: Using citation analysis and thick description to put authors in their place. Scientometrics, 54(1), 31-49. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015628320056
Davis, K. (1945). The world demographic transition. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 237(1), 1-11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/000271624523700102
Davis, W., Figgins, B., Hedengren, D.B., & Klein, D. (2011). Economics Professors’ Favorite Economic Thinkers, Journals, and Blogs (along with Party and Policy Views). Econ Journal Watch, 8 (2), 133-146. https://ideas.repec.org/a/ejw/journl/v8y2011i2p126-146.html
Dumont, A. (1890). Dépopulation et civilisation: étude démographique (13). Lecrosnier. https://wellcomecollection.org/works/s22u3fzc
Follett, C.H. (2020). Neo-Malthusianism and Coercive Population Control in China and India. Cato Institute, Policy Analysis. 897. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3660007
Galor, O., & Weil, D.N. (2000). Population, technology, and growth: From Malthusian stagnation to the demographic transition and beyond. American Economic Review, 90(4), 806-828. https://www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=10.1257/aer.90.4.806
Goldstein, J. R., & Cassidy, T. (2024). The Formal Demography of Peak Population. Demography, 61(2), 419–438. https://doi.org/10.1215/00703370-11216714
Graham, E. (2000). What kind of theory for what kind of population geography? International Journal of Population Geography, 6(4), 257–272.  https://doi.org/10.1002/1099-1220(200007/08)6:4<257::AID-IJPG189>3.0.CO;2-%23
Graham, E. (2021). Theory and explanation in demography: The case of low fertility in Europe. Population Studies, 75(1), 133–155. https://doi.org/10.1080/00324728.2021.1971742
Hajnal, J. (1965). European Marriage Patterns in Perspective. In D. V. Glass & D. E. C. Eversley (Eds.), Population in History. Essays in Historical Demography. 1, 101-143, New Brunswick (U.S.A.): Aldine Transaction. https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=2108168
Hobcraft, J. (2006). The ABC of demographic behaviour: How the interplays of alleles, brains, and contexts over the life course should shape research aimed at understanding population processes, Population Studies, 60, 153–187. https://doi.org/10.1080/00324720600646410
Hyland, K. (2004). Disciplinary discourses: Social interactions in academic writing. Ann Arbor, the University of Michigan Press. DOI: 10.3998/mpub.6719
Keyfitz, N. (1971). The role of theory in demography. Population Studies, 25(2), 159-167. https://doi.org/10.2307/2734542
Khalil, A., & Amjad, A. (2016). Rising Population and Food Insecurity Linkages in Pakistan: Testing Malthusian Population Growth Theory. https://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/71131.html
Krishnan, P. (2013). Glimpses of Indian Historical Demography, Delhi: B.R. Publishing Corporation. file:///C:/Users/win/Downloads/ojsadmin,+21301-52213-1-CE.pdf
Lesthaeghe, R. (2014). The second demographic transition: a concise overview of its development. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111(51), 18112–18115. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1420441111
Lesthaeghe, R. (2006), Second Demographic Transition, U.S, March, Population and Development Review, Available in: https://www.china-europa-forum.net/bdfdoc-53_en.html
Lesthaeghe, R. (2010). The unfolding story of the second demographic transition. Population and Development Review, 36(2), 211-251.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2010.00328.x
Lesthaeghe, R., & Van de Kaa, D.J. (1986). Twee demografische transities? (Two demographic transitions?). Bevolking - Groei en Krimp, Mens en Maatschappij, Van Loghum Slaterus, Deventer: van Loghum-Slaterus, 9-24.
Leydesdorff, L., & Cozzens, S.E. (1993). The Delineation of Specialties in Terms of Journals Using the Dynamic Journal Set of the Science Citation Index. Scientometrics, 26, 133-154. DOI: 10.1007/BF02016797
Malthus, T.R. (1798). An Essay on the Principle of Population (1 ed.). London: J. Johnson in St Paul's Church-yard. https://math.uchicago.edu/~shmuel/Modeling/Malthus,%20An%20essay%20on%20the%20principle%20of%20population.pdf
Malthus, T. R. (1826). An Essay on the Principle of Population; Or, A View of Its Past and Present Effects on Human Happiness: With an Enquiry into Our Prospects Respecting the Future Removal of Mitigation of the Evils which it Occasions (1). John Murray. https://oll.libertyfund.org/titles/malthus-an-essay-on-the-principle-of-population-vol-2-1826-6th-ed
Marx, W., Bornmann, L., Barth, A., & Leydesdorff, L. (2014). Detecting the historical roots of research fields by reference publication year spectroscopy (RPYS). Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology,65(4), 751–764.  https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23089
Myrskyla, M., Kohler, H.P., & Billari, F.C. (2009) Advances in Development Reverse Fertility Declines. Nature, 460, 741-743. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08230
Notestein, F.W. (1945). Population: the long view. In Food for the world (ed. T. W. Schultz), 36–57. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Pearson, K. (1896). Mathematical Contributions to the Theory of Evolution. III. Regression, Heredity, and Panmixia. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Containing Papers of a Mathematical or Physical Character, 192: 169-244. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.1896.0007
Roser, M. (2023). Demographic transition: Why is rapid population growth a temporary phenomenon? Published online at Our WorldinData.org. https://ourworldindata.org/demographic-transition#article-citation
Sigle, W. (2016). Why demography needs (new)theories. In: Mortelmans, Dimitri and Matthijs, Koenraad and Alofs, Elisabeth and Segaert, Barbara, (eds.) Changing Family Dynamics and Demographic Evolution: The FamilyKaleidoscope. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, UK, 271-233. ISBN 9781785364976.  http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/86429/
Thompson, W.S. (1929). Population. American, Journal of Sociology, 34(6), 959– 975. https://doi.org/10.1086/214874
United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division (2007). World Population Prospects: The 2006 Revision, Highlights. Working Paper No. ESA/P/WP.202. https://www.un.org/development/desa/pd/sites/www.un.org.development.desa.pd/files/files/documents/2020/Jan/un_2006_world_population_prospects-2006_revision_volume-i.pdf
Van de Kaa, D.J. (1987). Europe's second demographic transition. Population bulletin, 42(1),1-59. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12268395/
Van de Kaa, D.J. (2000). Postmodern Fertility Preferences: From Changing Value Orientation to New Behavior. Population and Development Review, 27:290–331. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:143375406
Van de Kaa, D.J. (2002). The Idea of a second Demographic Transition in Industrialized Countries, paper presented at the Sixth Welfare Policy Seminar of the National Institute of population and Social Security, Tokyo, Japan, 29 January 2002. file:///C:/Users/win/Downloads/The_Idea_of_a_Second_Demographic_Transition_in_Ind.pdf
Van de Kaa, D.J. (2004). The true commonality: In reflexive modern societies fertility is a derivative. Population Studies, 58(1), 77-81. https://doi.org/10.1080/0032472032000183762
Weil, D., & Wilde, J. (2010). How Relevant Is Malthus for Economic Development Today? American Economic Review. 100(2), 378-382. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4112762/
White, H.D. (2001). Authors as citers over time.Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52(2), 87-108.  https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-4571(2000)9999:9999<::AID-ASI1542>3.0.CO;2-T
 Wray, K.B. (2013). The Future of the Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Topoi—an International Review of Philosophy, 32(1), 75-79. DOI: 10.1007/s11245-012-9140-0
Zaidi, B., & Morgan, S.P. (2017). The Second demographic transition theory: A Review and Appraisal. Annul Reveiw of Sociology. 43, 473-492. doi: 10.1146/annurev-soc-060116-053442.
Zuanna G.D. (2007). Social mobility and fertility, Demographic Research, 17, 441-461. DOI: 10.4054/DemRes.2007.17.15
 
دوره 9، شماره 1 - شماره پیاپی 17
تاریخ انتشار: دی‌ماه 1404
خرداد 1402
صفحه 91-107

  • تاریخ دریافت 12 اسفند 1403
  • تاریخ بازنگری 27 اسفند 1403
  • تاریخ پذیرش 30 اسفند 1403
  • تاریخ انتشار 01 دی 1404