مطالعات جمعیتی

مطالعات جمعیتی

مطالعه ای کیفی از اقتصادگرایی خانواده در کرمانشاه

نوع مقاله : پژوهشی

نویسندگان
1 دانشیار جامعه‌شناسی، گروه جامعه‌شناسی، دانشکده علوم اجتماعی، دانشگاه رازی، کرمانشاه، ایران (نویسنده مسئول).
2 کارشناسی ارشد جامعه‌شناسی، گروه جامعه‌شناسی، دانشکده علوم اجتماعی، دانشگاه رازی، کرمانشاه، ایران.
چکیده
هدف پژوهش، بررسی اقتصادگرایی خانواده در شهر کرمانشاه به شیوه اکتشافی و با استفاده از نظریه زمینه‌ای است. نئولیبرالیسم با توجه به ساختار هر جامعه، از سازوکارهای متفاوتی برای تحمیل منطق خود بهره می‌برد که نیازمند واکاوی است. روش جمع‌آوری اطلاعات، مصاحبه به شیوه نیمه ساختاریافته بود. یافته‌ها نشان داد که شرایط علی اقتصادگرایی خانواده شامل نوسازی، بازاری شدن روابط اجتماعی و ارتباطات، عوامل زمینه‌ای شامل دگرگونی در ارزش‌ها و هنجارها و مصرف‌گرایی، عوامل مداخله‌گر شامل ضعف در حوزه سیاست‌گذاری، اقتصاد سیاسی و بحران‌های اقتصادی بوده است. در مواجهه با چنین وضعیتی اعضای خانواده به راهبرد فرهنگ‌سازی اقتصادی و جامعه‌پذیری اقتصادی روی آورده و پیامد آن در سطح فردی اختلالات روانی و در سطح اجتماعی بی‌تفاوتی اجتماعی و آسیب‌های اجتماعی بوده است. نتیجه کلی این‌که نئولیبرالیسم با توجه به ساختار اقتصادی و اجتماعی شهر کرمانشاه، سازوکارهای سلبی ویژه چنین وضعیتی به راه انداخته که برآیند آن، اقتصادگرایی خانواده از طریق تحمیل منطق بازار بوده است.
کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله English

A Qualitaive Study of Family Economism in Kermanshah

نویسندگان English

vakil ahmadi 1
Negin Nazari 2
1 Associate Professor of Sociology, Department of Sociology, Faculty of Social Sciences, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran. (Corresponding Author)
2 Master in Sociology, Department of Sociology, Faculty of Social Sciences, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran.
چکیده English

The aim of the research is to investigate family economism in Kermanshah city in an exploratory manner using grounded theory. Neoliberalism uses different mechanisms to impose its logic, depending on the structure of each society, which requires analysis. The method of data collection was semi-structured interviews. The findings showed that the causal conditions of family economism included modernization, marketization of social relations and communications, contextual factors included changes in values and norms and consumerism, and intervening factors included weakness in the field of policymaking, political economy, and economic crises. In the face of such a situation, family members turned to the strategy of economic culture and economic socialization, and the result was mental disorders at the individual level and social indifference and social harms at the social level. The general conclusion is that neoliberalism, considering the economic and social structure of Kermanshah city, has launched negative mechanisms specific to such a situation, the result of which was family economism through the imposition of market logic.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Consumerism
Family
Kermanshah
Marketization
Neoliberalism

Extended Abstract

Introduction

The family has always been one of the institutions that has had religious, social, cultural and economic functions. With the formation of modernity and changes in the mode of production, the family has undergone structural changes. All daily individual and social relations have no meaning except in the context of economic life. The family's life world is affected by economic mechanisms and is changing and transforming. The family in the city of Kermanshah is also affected to some extent by new mechanisms and has seen the changes that have occurred in the economic and social spheres of Iranian society. This highlights the need to examine the developments in the family in a society whose slogan is culture and the preservation of the family system. The main issue of the research is how the family institution has become isolated within the framework of the macro-social and cultural mechanism and has lost its main function, and their actions have tended towards economic relations?

Methodology and Data

The research method was qualitative and conducted using grounded theory; the chosen method should analyze and examine the practical and theoretical reasons of the actors in explaining their behavior. Data collection was through in-depth interviews. The target population was women and men in Kermanshah in 1403. The sampling method was theoretical and purposeful, guided by the research problem, and theoretical saturation continued until 24 people.

Finding

The findings showed that the causal conditions of family economism include modernization, marketization of social relations and communications. Modernization imposes new economic and capitalist relations on society and tries to highlight economic logic and uniformity to advance capitalist relations. Marketization has caused social dysfunction of the family. It has reduced public services and monetized them, as well as reduced social functions of the family and eliminated some of its functions in favor of market logic and the production of profit accumulation at the macro level. Communications are also the main tool in the service of neoliberalism to propagate and promote the market mechanism on family life, which, through media and advertising, tries to influence all macro levels of society and create its own culture for alignment. The social and economic contexts of economism in the family have included changes in values ​​and norms and consumerism, changes in social values ​​and norms and consumerism. The interfering factors of family economism have included weakness in the field of policymaking, political economy, and economic crises. At the macro level, power institutions have also been able to impose economism on the family institution as intervention factors, which is a result of weakness in the field of social and economic policy-making, the political economy of the government, and economic crises. When power institutions at the cultural and social levels cannot provide new laws in line with developments and do not have correct policy-making, the family institution will inevitably take the path imposed by market logic. Faced with such a situation, family members have turned to the strategy of economic culture and economic socialization, and the result is mental disorders at the individual level and social indifference and social harms at the social level.

Discussion and Conclusion

Neoliberalism in every society has chosen specific mechanisms and imposed its logic according to its economic, social and cultural structure and characteristics. It seems that in Iran and especially in the city of Kermanshah, neoliberalism has opened paths for changing the family through the ineffectiveness of the government's political economy in the face of economic crises, which ultimately resulted in family economism, and this approach in Kermanshah has been more negative than positive. In other words, it has used the intra-social capital that has created eye and eye to impose fashion and consumerism, which is different from consumerism and fashion in developed and modern cities. It has also used economic crises and inflation to make money and the value of savings important and to reduce social relations, rather than the positive side, which is economic growth and high income, and as a result, consumerism.

The modern economic logic, by providing all social elements, has caused the freedom of action to be taken away from the members of that society and everything is reproduced within the framework of its mechanisms. A purely economic view of marriage, childbearing, and dowry has caused a decrease in the marriage rate, an increase in the age of marriage, and a decrease in fertility. The social changes that have occurred in some social institutions, such as the family, have been forced, imposed, and unwanted. Therefore, with the introduction of economic logic (market) into the family, there are irreparable cultural and social costs for the family and society.

استالابراس، جولیان (۱۳۸۹). هنر معاصر پس از جنگ سرد، ترجمه بهرنگ حسینی پور، تهران: نشرچشمه.
اعزازی، شهلا (۱۳۷۶). جامعه‌شناسی خانواده با تأکید بر نقش، ساختار و کارکرد خانواده در دوران معاصر، تهران: نشر روشنگران.
احمدی، وکیل، قلی‌‌پور، سیاوش، ناصری، میلاد (1402). همسان‌همسری و باز تعریف نقش زنان در تصمیمات اقتصادی خانواده، موردمطالعه شهر اسلام‌آباد غرب. مجله تداوم و تغییرات اجتماعی، 3(1): 35-54. https://doi.org/10.22034/jscc.2023.20568.1085
استراوس، انسلم؛ جولیت، کربین (۱۳۹۱). مبانی پژوهش کیفی، فنون مراحل و نظریه زمینه‌ای، ترجمه ابراهیم افشار، تهران: نشر نی.
 برمن، مارشال (۱۴۰۰). تجربه مدرنیته، ترجمه مراد فرهاد پور، چاپ ششم، تهران: انتشارات طرح نقد.
بوردیو، پیر (۱۳۸۷). گفتارهایی درباره‌ ایستادگی در برابر نولیبرالیسم، ترجمه علیرضا پلاسید، تهران: نشر اختران.
بهنام، جمشید (۱۳۸۳). تحولات خانواده؛ پویایی خانواده در حوزه‌های فرهنگی گوناگون، ترجمه محمدجعفر پوینده، تهران: نشر ماهی.
جعفری ندوشن، علی‌اکبر، رعیتی شوازی علیرضا (۱۳۹۳). بررسی نقش بازار سرمایه در امنیت خانواده. پژوهش‌های راهبردی امنیت و نظم اجتماعی، 3 (2): ۱۱۵- ۱۳۱. https://dor.isc.ac/dor/20.1001.1.23221453.1393.3.2.8.1
هان، بیونگ چول (۱۳۹۸). روان سیاست: نئولیبرال و فناوری‌های جدید قدرت، مترجم، مصطفی انصافی، تهران: نشر لوگوس.
دفتر طرح‌های ملی با همکار مرکز ملی رصد اجتماعی وزارت کشور (۱۴۰۲). ارزش‌ها و نگرش‌های ایرانیان موج چهارم. پژوهشگاه، فرهنگ هنر و ارتباطات.
زراتسکی، ایلای (۱۳۹۸). سرمایه‌داری، خانواده و زندگی شخصی، ترجمه منیژه نجم عراقی، تهران: نشر نی.
شکفته، رها، میرزایی، حسین، مجدی، علی­اکبر (۱۴۰۱). بررسی عمومیت شیوه مدیریت اقتصادی خانواده در مشهد و عوامل مؤثر بر آن. جامعه‌شناسی کاربردی، 33 (1): ۱۱۱- ۱۳۲. https://doi.org/10.22108/jas.2021.125158.1989
گیدنز، آنتونی (۱۳۸۷). پیامدهای مدرنیت، ترجمه محسن ثلاثی، چاپ اول، تهران: مرکز.
گیگان، جم مک (۱۴۰۰). فرهنگ نئولیبرال، ترجمه نریمان افشاری، تهران: نشر همشهری.
لاتزارتو، موریتزیو (۱۳۹۴). ساحت انسان بدهکار، جستاری در وضعیت نئولیبرالیسم، ترجمه پیمان غلامی.
نگری، آنتونیو، هارت، مایکل (۱۳۹۱). امپراتوری، تبارشناسی جهانی­شدن، ترجمه رضا نجف‌زاده، تهران: نشر قصیده­سرا.
واروفاکیس، یانیس (۱۳۹۷). حرف‌هایی با دخترم درباره اقتصاد: تاریخ مختصر سرمایه‌داری، ترجمه فرهاد اکبر زاده، تهران: نشر بان.
واعظی، سید عباس، فیاض ابراهیم، ساکیانی، زهرا (۱۴۰۲). تحلیل آثار نظام سرمایه‌داری در تغییر ساختار خانواده و روابط جنسی آزاد. نشریه علمی مطالعات میان‌رشته‌ای تمدن انقلاب اسلامی، 2 (3): ۷۵- ۹۹.  https://doi.org/10.28211685/CIR.2311.1098.2.6.4
 هاروی، دیوید (۱۳۸۶). تاریخ مختصر نئولیبرالیسم، ترجمه محمود عبدالله زاده، تهران: نشر اختران.
Abbasi-shavazi, M., J. & Mc Donald, P. (2008). Family Change in Iran: Religion, Revolution, and the state. Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.                                                                                                                           
Farrell, B.G., Vande Vusse, A.J., & Ocobock, A. (2012). Family change and the state of family sociology. Current Sociology, 60, 283 - 301. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392111425599
Joshi, R., & Singh, C.K. (2023). Organisational Transformation of Family structure in the Modern Era. Vigyan Varta, 4(7), 156-161.   https://scholar.google.com/citations?view_op=view_citation&hl=en&user=fwsp0aMAAAAJ&citation_for_view=fwsp0aMAAAAJ:9yKSN-GCB0IC
Fridman, J. (1994). Cultural ldenty & Global process, London, Sage.
Polanyi, K. (1975). Trade and Market in the Early Empires. Glencoe, IL: Free press.
Sandel, M.J. (2013). Market reasoning as moral reasoning: why economists shoud re_cegage with political philosophy.The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 27(4), 121-140. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep
Sklair, L. (1998). Competing Conception of Globalization. Journal of world Systems Research. https://doi.org/10.5195/JWSR.1999.140
Wyn, J., Lantz, S., & Harris, A. (2012). Beyond the ‘transitions’ metaphor: Family relations and young people in late modernity. Journal of Sociology, 48(1), 3-22. https://doi.org/10.1177/1440783311408971
 
دوره 9، شماره 1 - شماره پیاپی 17
تاریخ انتشار: دی‌ماه 1404
خرداد 1402
صفحه 195-211

  • تاریخ دریافت 24 شهریور 1404
  • تاریخ بازنگری 11 آذر 1404
  • تاریخ پذیرش 12 آذر 1404
  • تاریخ انتشار 01 دی 1404